How AI will change a developer's job

Michael Aguilar
Page content

There’s been a lot of noise about AI replacing developers. Spoiler: it won’t. But your job is changing in ways nobody’s really talking about.

You’re not coding slower – you’re debugging faster

Remember Knight Capital losing $500 million in 45 minutes? No AI involved. Just human process gaps snowballing into disaster. Now imagine that snowball rolling downhill at machine speed.

That’s what happens when you use AI. Every time you hit “enter,” it’s like handing the codebase to a new developer who didn’t read the docs. Except instead of weeks between handoffs, it’s seconds.

The file-moving disaster where someone lost their data? Classic example. Experienced developers would copy files first, verify, then delete. AI doesn’t think like that unless you tell it. You become the quality gatekeeper, archaeologist, and architect all at once.

What actually changes in your day

Forget “AI writes your code.” The reality is messier:

  • You spot the tripwires
    AI won’t remember your company’s CVE blacklist. When it suggests an outdated library, you’re the only one who knows it’s got that nasty deserialization flaw. Security isn’t in the prompt – it’s in your gut.

  • You speak human
    Ever tried explaining to AI why the finance team rejects REST but loves gRPC? Good luck. You’ll spend more time translating between business needs and AI hallucinations than writing JSON schemas.

  • You smell the stink
    That weird recursion pattern? The overengineered try/catch block? You learn to scan AI output for “code smells” like a bloodhound. Seasoned devs see it instantly; juniors ship it to production.

  • You unstick the stuck
    When AI goes in circles on a bug (and it will), you don’t just rewrite the prompt. You switch tactics entirely – maybe mock the API instead of fighting the auth layer. It’s like coaching, not commanding.

The real shift: from coder to conductor

You’re not just reviewing code anymore. You’re:

  • Stress-testing every AI suggestion against real-world operational quirks (“Will this break during payroll processing?”)
  • Building validation guardrails before asking for code (“First write the test suite, then implement”)
  • Knowing when to say “no” to the shiny new framework because it clashes with your SSO policies

The GitHub repo full of “AI-written code” that works today? It’s the boring stuff behind it that matters: the test coverage thresholds, the context-aware prompts, the rollback procedures when the AI goes off the rails.

Experience isn’t optional anymore

New devs using AI can spin up features shockingly fast. Then they hit the wall when:

  • The AI suggests violating your deployment pipeline rules
  • It “forgets” the database was migrated last Tuesday
  • It writes perfect code that ignores firewalled environments

This is where you earn your pay. You know why we use Sidekiq instead of Celery here. You remember the outage caused by optimistic locking. You spot the edge cases the AI never considered because they’re buried in a Slack thread from 2022.

AI won’t replace developers. But developers who treat AI like magic will get replaced by those who treat it like a tool - helpful in the right circumstances, but dangerous for the unintiated.